A case of undeclared debt? Claude Lévi‐Strauss’ ambiguities and paradoxes toward analytical psychology.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Serina, Florent
  • Source:
    Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences. Summer2018, Vol. 54 Issue 3, p163-177. 15p.
  • Additional Information
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Abstract: If his relationship to Sigmund Freud's psychoanalysis has been widely acknowledged, Claude Lévi‐Strauss’ rapport with C.G. Jung's analytical psychology remains quite obscure. While secondary commentary has been abundant, its approach has above all been intertextual, to the detriment of a rigorously historical reading. Even if certain arguments put forward by supporters of so‐called “influence” deserve to be taken into account, especially because they highlight Lévi‐Strauss ambiguities and paradoxes toward Jung, this paper provides proof that a precise reading of the texts, with the help of recent studies on the intellectual genesis of Lévi‐Strauss, lead to reject the thesis of an unstated debt owed by the French anthropologist to the Zurich psychologist. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • Abstract:
      Copyright of Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences is the property of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)