Question wording and attitudinal ambivalence: COVID, the economy, and Americans' response to a real‐life trolley problem.

TRUMP, Donald, 1946-; DEMOCRATIC Party (U.S.); COVID-19; COVID-19 pandemic; DILEMMA; SOCIAL distancing; POLITICIANS; ETHICAL problems; AMBIVALENCE

Objective: As the coronavirus pandemic raged throughout 2020, political leaders faced a difficult choice: Should strict social distancing guidelines be maintained until the threat posed by COVID‐19 was diminished enough for citizens to return to their regular activities? Or was the economic disruption caused by the pandemic something that was, according to President Trump, "worse than the problem itself"? Methods: We analyze data from a 2020 survey of registered voters. Results: Democrats were more likely than Republicans to resolve the tradeoff in favor of maintaining social distancing over rebuilding the economy. More importantly, we find that when faced with this moral dilemma (measured by one's choice between a utilitarian vs. a deontological approach when confronted with a real‐life "trolley problem"), many citizens from both sides of the partisan aisle were of two minds on the subject. Conclusion: Americans are ambivalent about the appropriate government response to COVID‐19. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell) is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)